Skip to content
Open the app →

What students see

Your marking capture is constant: you give an overall mark, record indicators, and write notes. What students see is a separate choice.

IOA Marker offers four student views. You choose one per assessment based on the stakes, what you promised students, and what makes sense pedagogically.

The student sees:

  • Criteria table with per-criterion scores
  • Your indicators (strengths and areas for improvement)
  • Overall mark
  • Written comments

Use when: You want maximum transparency. The student sees both the analytic breakdown (criteria) and the specific observations (indicators) that informed it. Recommended for most formal assessments.

The student sees:

  • Your indicators (strengths and areas for improvement)
  • Overall mark
  • Written comments

No criteria table.

Use when: You want to show what you actually observed without implying you scored each criterion separately. Good for assessments where the indicators are the feedback — the specific behaviors matter more than category scores.

The student sees:

  • Criteria table with per-criterion scores
  • Overall mark
  • Written comments

No indicators.

Use when: Your institution requires a traditional rubric view, or you published criteria to students and they expect to see scores against them. The indicators still guide the derivation, but students see only the summarized result.

The student sees:

  • Overall mark
  • Written comments

No criteria table, no indicators.

Use when: Low-stakes or formative assessments where detailed breakdowns would be overkill. The written comments carry the feedback; the mark is just a number.

Each student view works with one or both marking modes:

Student viewMarking modes available
Full breakdownIndicators mode
Indicators onlyIndicators mode
Criteria table onlyIndicators mode or Criteria mode
Overall mark onlyIndicators mode

Most views use indicators mode: you record indicators and the overall mark; the app derives criterion scores if needed.

Criteria table only also supports criteria mode: you enter per-criterion scores directly. This is the traditional rubric approach, better for written work you can read criterion-by-criterion.

Your contextRecommended view
Formal IOA, students expect detailed feedbackFull breakdown
IOA where specific observations matter mostIndicators only
Institution requires traditional rubric displayCriteria table only
Low-stakes check-in, formative feedbackOverall mark only

When in doubt, start with Full breakdown — it’s the most complete and works well for most formal assessments.

Each assessment has its own student view setting. You can run different assessments with different views: a formative “overall mark only” early in the semester, a formal “full breakdown” for the final IOA.

The choice is made in setup and applies to all students in that assessment.